Niveles de neopterina y síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica en pacientes críticos pediátricos / Neopterin levels and systemic inflammatory response syndrome in pediatric critically ill patients

Introducción: La neopterina y biopterina, subproductos de reacciones redox, son cofactores en la producción de óxido nítrico. Hipótesis: La neopterina y biopterina plasmáticas sufren evolución diferente durante los primeros días de una enfermedad crítica en pediatría. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo observacional monocéntrico en pacientes de 7 días-14 años ingresados en UCIP con criterios de SRIS. Se recogieron, al ingreso y a las 24 h, los niveles de neopterina y biopterina, otros reactantes de fase aguda y datos clínicos. Resultados: Se analizó a 28 pacientes, el 78,9% varones, de 5,04 años (RIQ 1,47-10,26), con PRISM II 2,0% (RIQ 1,1-5,0), ventilación mecánica (VM) en 90% (36,8% >24 h), duración de VM de 6,0 h (RIQ 3,7-102,0), ingreso en UCIP de 5,0 días (RIQ 2,7-18,7), media de VIS máximo de 0 (RIQ 0-14). La neopterina inicial fue de 2,3 ± 1,2 nmol/l y a las 24 h de 2,3 ± 1,4 nmol/l. La biopterina basal fue 1,3 ± 0,5 nmol/l y a las 24h 1,4 ± 0,4 nmol/l. La neopterina fue significativamente mayor en estancia > 6 días (p = 0,02), VM > 24h (p = 0,023) y con complicaciones (p = 0,05). La neopterina se correlaciona de forma directa con la duración de VM (rho = 0,6; p = 0,011), la estancia en UCIP (rho = 0,75; p < 0,0001) y el VIS (rho = 0,73; p = 0,001). Adicionalmente, la biopterina se correlaciona directamente con el PRISM (rho = 0,61; p = 0,008) y la cifra de leucocitos (rho = 0,88; p = 0,002). Discusión: Existe un ascenso de neopterina con mayor estancia, mayor VIS, VM más duradera y aparición de complicaciones, lo que refleja una activación del sistema inmune celular en los más graves (AU)

Introduction: Neopterin and biopterin are sub-products of redox reactions, which act as cofactors of enzymes responsible for nitric oxide production. The hypothesis is presented that plasma neopterin and biopterin evolve differently during the first days in a critically ill child. Methods: A single-centre prospective observational study was conducted on patients 7 days to 14 years admitted to our Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and that met Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Neopterin and biopterin levels, as well as other acute phase reactants, were collected at admission and at 24 h. Results: A total of 28 patients were included, of which 78.9% were male, The median age was 5.04 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1.47-10.26), and PRISM II 2.0% (IQR 1.1-5.0). Mechanical ventilation (MV) was used in 90% of patients, with a median duration of 6.0 hrs (IQR 3.7-102.0). The median length of stay in PICU was 5.0 days (IQR 2.7-18.7), maximum VIS mean of 0 (IQR 0-14). Baseline neopterin level was 2.3±1.2 nmol/l and at 24 h it was 2.3±1.4 nmol/l. Baseline biopterin was 1.3±0.5 nmol/l and 1.4±0.4 nmol/l at 24 h. Neopterin levels were significantly higher in patients with PICU length of stay > 6 days (P=.02), patients who needed MV >24 h (P=.023), and those who developed complications (P=.05). Neopterin correlates directly and is statistically significant with the duration of MV (rho=.6, P=.011), PICU length of stay (rho=.75, P<.0001), and VIS (rho=.73, P=.001). Additionally, biopterin directly correlates with the PRISM (rho=.61, P=.008). Discussion: There is a higher neopterin level when there is a longer PICU stay, higher VIS score, longer time on MV, and occurrence of complications, indicating the involvement of an activation of the cellular immune system (AU)

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is not associated with elevated serum neopterin levels

Neopterin, a marker of cellular immune activation, was elevated in patients who had cervical cancer in previous studies. To examine neopterin in the presence of precursors to cervical cancer (i.e. cervical intraepithelial) we measured serum levels in 185 colposcopy patients in Jamaica, a country with high cervical cancer incidence, and in 72 age-matched Jamaican women selected from a large population-based sample. We also measured serum levels of B-2 microglobulin, another commonly used marker of immune activation. Neopterin and B-2 microglobulin levels were not elevated in colposcopy patients; neither were they rel ted to severity of cervical neoplasia. In multivariable analysis, neither adjustments for detection of cervical human papillomavirus DNA by PCR nor detection of antibodies to human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (a retrovirus endemic to Jamaica) altered our findings. The absence of serologically detectable increase in cellular immune activation linked to cervical intraepithelial neoplasmia does not involve susbtantial systemic immune activation. (AU)